38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Executive

‘Made mistake by retweeting’, Arvind Kejriwal to SC in defamation case

By Jhanak Singh      26 February, 2024 04:07 PM      0 Comments
Made mistake by retweeting Arvind Kejriwal to SC in defamation case

NEW DELHI: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Monday told the Supreme Court that he made a mistake by retweeting an allegedly defamatory video circulated by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in 2018.

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, following the statement, sought to know from the complainant whether he wanted to close the matter in view of the Chief Minister’s apology and statement.

The court did not issue notice on a plea filed by Kejriwal against a Delhi High Court order, which upheld summons issued to him as an accused in the criminal defamation case.

The high court on February 5, 2024 had said that reposting alleged libellous content would attract the defamation law.

During the proceedings, senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi for Kejriwal, said, “I can say this much that I made a mistake by retweeting.”

In view of his statement, the bench also asked the trial court not to take up the defamation case involving Kejriwal till March 11.

"In the interim, the trial court will not take up the matter," the bench said.

The high court had said a sense of responsibility has to be attached while retweeting content about which one does not have knowledge. Kejriwal had said in the high court that the trial court failed to appreciate that his tweet was not intended or likely to harm the complainant, Vikas Sankrityayan.

The high court said that retweeting of defamatory content must invite penal, civil as well as tort action if the person retweeting it does not attach a disclaimer.

Kejriwal had claimed before the high court that the trial court erred in not providing any reasons for issuing the summons. The complainant claimed the YouTube video titled ‘BJP IT Cell Part II’ was circulated by Rathee, who lives in Germany, “wherein a number of false and defamatory allegations were made”.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak Singh - Lawstreet Journal

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS

lawyers-services-not-covered-under-consumer-protection-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

14 May, 2024 04:13 PM
sc-rebukes-ima-chief-rejects-apology-for-remarks
Trending Judiciary
SC rebukes IMA chief; rejects apology for remarks

SC rebukes IMA chief R V Asokan; rejects his apology for remarks against the court in contempt proceedings involving Baba Ramdev and Patanjali's MD Acharya Balkrishna.

15 May, 2024 11:02 AM

TOP STORIES

supreme-court-warns-against-hasty-accusations-of-parental-alienation-syndrome
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court warns against hasty accusations of Parental Alienation Syndrome [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court cautions against hastily accusing parents of 'Parental Alienation Syndrome'; emphasizes need for specific instances in custody disputes.

09 May, 2024 03:50 PM
benefit-enjoyed-by-bank-staff-in-form-of-interest-free-loans-taxable-as-perquisites-sc
Trending Judiciary
Benefit enjoyed by bank staff in form of interest free loans taxable as perquisites: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules bank staff's interest-free loans taxable as perquisites under Income Tax Act, upholding validity of Section 17(2)(viii).

09 May, 2024 05:33 PM
only-wildlife-cover-was-on-fire-uttarakhand-govt-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Only 0.1% wildlife cover was on fire, Uttarakhand govt tells SC

Uttarakhand govt clarifies to SC: Only 0.1% wildlife affected by forest fires, disputes media's 40% claim. Man-made fires tackled; preventive measures pledged.

09 May, 2024 06:15 PM
neither-fundamental-nor-constitutional-not-even-legal-right-ed-opposes-in-sc-interim-bail-for-kejriwal-to-campaign-in-election
Trending Judiciary
'Neither fundamental, nor constitutional, not even legal right', ED opposes in SC interim bail for Kejriwal to campaign in election

ED opposes interim bail for Kejriwal to campaign, citing no legal, constitutional, or fundamental right for politicians. Equality and rule of law at stake.

09 May, 2024 06:50 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email